Patches within the Array
©, 2021 by das landstuhler
ල
plying our way thru an abject heap, which has already been dissolved by measures in the breath of gravity, we can either gather-up what sense is there, one could surmise, or, if we are so inclined, we may dive into the lot, which of course is a root of the divine.
ල
is there, in other words, a pure abjectivity? and is a pure abjectivity, whether or not available, even useable by the mundane within mediocrity? Could there really be a scalpel so sharp, that using it would only split atoms of plutonium?
ල
there is perchance, the question of notions in the periphery. as it is said in Rome, "nato ai bordi di periferia". and these notions are whole in every way, so that the fringe of a scope shows only latent fragmenting.
ල
there are the jovial increments of reasoning, which can move to cultural trends. but. as these narrow glimpses begin to beckon for more, we become directly inundated by sheer floods of acceptability, and these then, tamped thru a deluge of delusion-filled blame.
ල
and of course, that could very well bring us up to the subject for calculatable differentials between simple recognition, a much larger complex series of identities in part, and their algebraic inflexions, thereof.
ල
thus in illustrative description albeit posthaste, there is the purely discursive. that line which is drawn between pure discursion and abjectivity could all together be removed. there. just like that. thus a refined discursive would equal whatever abjectivity we had, at that frame, chosen to step back and define. for instance, make distance equal a shadow, merely as a temporary tool to reach such greatly adherable duration sequences.
all-in-all, we could say sub-tedium, that for something to be truly abject, it would need a base, or basis, to start its address. so that solemnly-filtered abject cognitive-association, could be called many things including, "flying high", or at the plane with zero base, aborted as non-existent.
