The Transporter Statham Qi

below is a link to The Transporter - 2002
//==
Click this link to go to film. :)
//==

The Transporter

//==
don't miss the song at the end, Nadia Life Of A Stranger Lyrics.

THE RADIANT NIGHT

IN THE RADIANT NIGHT,
          while and as he mused, shuffling the then, and the there, and the other, and the parts not envisioned in this cascading and tumbling radiant night, and imprinted, forward.  yet upon another.

          there, but again, gone, was the moment before the shine in his eyes.  and the pieces of that breath, of that day, just 'a lazily arranged.

          BUT SET.
               so to catch another to travel away from these great and consuming collections, which when over-filled would naturally shimmer in sweet vibrance and potent depth.

HE BEGAN.
          and he strode.  and none-the-falter became his every move, his every passion, his coming to right, a clumped, wadded, and attached fray of the spark before grinding, that would pass when the day became juice, and the night went like paste.

                                                                -das landstuhler - 2006
//==

Perry Mason - 1957

conclusion from THE CASE OF THE MOTH-EATEN MINK

J. i'd like to talk to you, Mason.
M. i haven't got much time.  i'm due back in court in a few minutes.
J. how come the office is empty?
M. one of my stenographers is getting married.  they're giving her a luncheon.  now, what can i do for you?
J. a little while ago, back there in court, it sounded to me like maybe you have this Claremont case on ice.
M. well, i'm glad you were listening.
J. do you know who killed him?
M. why?
J. well, it's kind of a personal thing with me.  you see, Bob Claremont was one of my boys.  it would mean a good deal to me if i could bring in his killer.
M. Promotion?
J. no, i don't care about that.
M. then why don't you make it easy on yourself?
J. how?
M. give up.
J. what are you talking about?
M. you killed Claremont and you killed Fayette, or you had him killed.
J. Mason, are you out of your mind?
M. Claremont was an honest cop doing his job.  he got a lead on you through Tom Sedgewick.  he went to the Keymont Hotel to find you, remember?
J. are - -  are you trying to frame me to take the heat off your client?
M. you were in Fayette's room the night Claremont went there.
J. i was nowhere near that hotel.
M. you're lying, Jaffrey.  your protege, Frank Hoxie, testified that Claremont was at the hotel.  eventually, he's gonna tell us that you were there too.
J. Hoxie, a con like Hoxie will say anything under pressure.
M. you had him sent on a phony trip to Mexico for a month.  you had him kept there til the case died out of the papers.
J. you never give up, do you?
M. that was a pretty smart insurance policy you had figured out.  planting a dead policeman's gun on Sedgewick, an innocent man.
J. save it, Mason.  you're nowhere.
M. you were safe as long as Sedgewick was a fugitive.  but he came back.  now why was Fayette killed?  because he got panicky when Dixie Dayton got away?
J. i never saw George Fayette in my life.  i never even knew he existed until the night he was killed.  - -  what's that?
M. a copy of the receipt you signed when you took the record of Fayette's arrest for bookmaking out of the Police Department's files.
J. look, i'm a cop.  i take hundreds of records out of the file every day, and i sign receipts for them.  it's part of my job.  Mason, you're wasting my time.
M. mr. Wilson.  is it part of your job to own the Keymont Hotel?
--Scene--
show's paper.
M. a copy of the incorporation papers with your signature.  you can change your name, Jaffrey, but not your handwriting.
--Scene--
closes door.  shown producing and pointing a revolver.
M. put it away, Jaffrey.  you're through.  you've got no place to hide.
J. let me worry about that.  you put a lot of pieces together, Mason.  but you aren't going anywhere with it.
M. how do you expect to stop me?
J. easy.  i'm going to arrest you for trying to bribe me into perjuring myself.
M. think you can make it stick?
J. i won't have to.  you're gonna resist me.  and i'll have to shoot you in the line of duty.  all they gotta do is half-believe me and i'm home.

--Scene--
Tragg is shown looking through a side door.
//==

//==
T. hold it, Jaffrey!
--Scene--
shots fired and scuffle.
M. okay, lieutenant.
T. wasn't one cop enough, you miserable - -
M. you alright, Tragg?
T. yeah.  just sick to my stomach at the sight of him.  you work hard at your job.  you try to take some pride in what you're doing, and then a fink like this comes along and makes a rotten thing out of his badge.
M. here, i'd better call an ambulance.
T. yeah, call an ambulance.  - -  don't, uh, hurry.

BRIGANDS VERSUS CHIEFS

NO CASTLE IN A DEN

what's the literal definition of "impeach". you'll be surprised. Answer. it means to "nullify". so let's take a look at this scenario. all [that's a very firm all] Evidence can only [that's a very firm only] be based on Discovery. then in turn, all [this is also a very firm all] Facts can only [that's also a very firm only] be based on said Evidence. so in this illustration you have the "Class" of Evidence, and its subClass extension, the Facts, necessarily connected to their root superClass, the Discovery. now that's a consistent tree of logical suppositions. and when these 3 Classes [the subClass, the Class, the superClass] are identified together, a fourth term is generated. this 4th term is called "Foundation". so that when a Fact is unsubstantiated in either its earlier root of Evidence or Discovery, it is referred to as "Unfounded" [and this said Fact or Facts is stricken], unless it can be "Founded" within some reasonable parameter. and "Reasonableness" never varies. so much so, that if during a felon's testimony, this felon voluntarily admits to committing some parallel crime, he therewithall, has "impeached" all foundation to bearing witness to a later testimony. to wit, not only is this felon's testimony stricken, it is nullified [in other words, impeached]. so, is that what the Carnival of Bench Tribunals is discussing? how some member in the ether [which by default makes that or any similar witness void of "Foundation", and thus "self-impeached"], can show reasons for Impeachment? a "self-impeachment" describing the reasons for impeachment? that [this thing depicted] in itself, is grounds for contempt, just stipulating the rules of order and decorum in assembly and committee. and there is a myriad of recursions thus forthwith from and does 1 thru 100. :( ^^ -das Landstuhler, 2019
//==

Giovanni_Fattori_-_Episodio_della_campagna_contro_il_brigantggio_1864

Becoming Water

IN MEMORY OF REX RACER.

//==

the image of Hanbo [courtesy of Hayes World Images], shows a shorter Hanbo than ones used by Kusanagi Labs.  Here, a 34 inch Hanbo is cut from the larger [western style] brooms, in this case, Hickory sticks work very well for their extra weight.  although 34 inches seems arbitrary, especially since the famous Hanbos are shorter than this, from a long experience with different distances, the 34 inch length, made of the thicker broom handles, and of Hickory, are the most inter-respective of the different shapes and sizes of things, when swinging 36 inch chains, and playing with longer and thinner jos, and finding a median between Kenpo, Nikenryu, and shadow swinging, etc.

//==

say for instance, that truth, "the Truth ", was 2 times a full Vedic Aura, which would then be 28 inches, then with these wall standing techniques, the extra 6 inches fits, so next to perfect, that there's really no need what-so-ever to add or subtract a half inch.  it will also sweep evenly with its purpose [at 34 inches], and in this particular case, that purpose is to balance it [the 34 inch stick] blind-folded, upright vertically, on its rounded end, from the palm of the hand only.

Mr. Steven Hayes - student of Ninjutsu

//==

however.  this is not a treatise on Jedi.  it is to point out a single aspect of the end result.  namely.  when one can balance a stick blind-folded, since one is then "floating" the stick, they then, become the water.  -M kusanagi  6, 26, 2019  :)  ^^

//==

Nadler"s Tribunal

*THIS MORNING'S ABUSE OF POWER*
 - - - - April 3, 2019
Nadler is now leading into uncharted territory exclusively red carpeted for the distinguished members of tribunals [not unlike the Spanish Inquisition].  hear ye hear ye!  this 1st tribunal of the Annexed States of Deplorable-ness, will now come to order!!  who's on the chopping block?
>
the list is to your left, sir.
>
ah yes, the list.  in order of our need to have such voices banned from the tele-type, their names are listed here in order of importance, that we get to them, and silence their meaningless lives, for the good of the tribunals.  do i hear a second?
>
second, sir!
>
i submit these first 5 names, not only as evidence that we are brave, but that we have been hard-working to find the atrocity that is now before us.
1.     Reince Priebus
2.     Donald McGahn
3.     Ann Donaldson
4.     Steven Bannon
5.     Hope Hicks
thus submitting these names, behold the agony that i, head chair of this tribunal, Nadler the Ninny, can cause to you tiny gadflies under my massive thumb of power.   submit, submit, submit, with zero regard for law, o yes, for Nadler's circus is high high high court, or there will be no end to the suffering we will cause thee, if you don't!!  ^^  -msi

courtesy of lilith studios